Why categories are fixed
A contact’s category controls more than how it’s displayed:- Form fields — the contact form shows different fields per category (e.g., adjusters get claim-number and carrier fields; medical providers get NPI and tax-ID fields).
- Journey linking — when you attach a contact to a journey, the relationship type that’s offered depends on the category (a
MEDICAL_PROVIDERcan be linked as treating provider, IME, or expert witness; aDEFENDANTcan only be linked as defendant or adverse party). - Reporting — caseload analytics, fee-attribution, and the COO Engine all bucket activity by contact category.
- Search — global search filters by category, so you can scope to “find me every adjuster from State Farm” rather than “find me everyone with State Farm in their name.”
The twelve categories
The plaintiff (client) themselves is not a contact — clients live on the journey itself, not in the contact directory. A client’s emergency contact is what would go in Client Related.
Picking the right category
Two patterns to keep in mind:- Role, not relationship. Categorize by what role this person plays in plaintiff PI cases generally. A surgeon who later testifies as your retained expert is two records — one Medical Provider for the treatment, one Expert Witness for the retained role. They’re different relationships and you’ll want to bill, contact, and report on them differently.
- One contact, one category. Don’t shoehorn a single record into multiple roles — split into two records.
What if none fit?
If you have a recurring need that none of the 12 categories cover, that’s a signal worth surfacing — open a bug report describing the use case. The taxonomy is fixed today, but it’s evolved before based on real-firm feedback.Linking and managing contacts on a journey: Managing Contacts.
